<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 39 years ago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smithersmpls.com/2009/05/05/39-years-ago-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smithersmpls.com/2009/05/05/39-years-ago-3/</link>
	<description>"Where hacks come to spew nonsense" - B2B</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:04:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Baba</title>
		<link>http://smithersmpls.com/2009/05/05/39-years-ago-3/comment-page-1/#comment-35441</link>
		<dc:creator>Baba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smithersmpls.com/2009/05/05/39-years-ago-3/#comment-35441</guid>
		<description>I will always question my government because of the events of that day. Some of the guardsman are dead, but some remain and have kept silent about this. Shame on them! The soldiers literally got away with murder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will always question my government because of the events of that day. Some of the guardsman are dead, but some remain and have kept silent about this. Shame on them! The soldiers literally got away with murder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Family Ties</title>
		<link>http://smithersmpls.com/2009/05/05/39-years-ago-3/comment-page-1/#comment-35440</link>
		<dc:creator>Family Ties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smithersmpls.com/2009/05/05/39-years-ago-3/#comment-35440</guid>
		<description>&quot;Whose orders? At week&#039;s end there was still no answer. Canterbury (Brigadier General Robert Canterbury, the ranking officer on the campus,)insisted that &quot;no one gave an order.&quot; That statement strains credibility. By Canterbury&#039;s own count, 16 or 17 men fired 35 rounds. They started at virtually the same moment and stopped at the same moment. Many civilian spectators at the scene and some officials seeking to reconstruct the event are convinced that an order was given. And someone made the initial mistake of ordering live ammunition distributed to all the men and permitting them to load their rifles—a procedure that is contrary to regular Army practice in civil disturbances. Once weapons are loaded, says one Pentagon officer, &quot;you have effectively lost control of that unit. You have given them the license to fire.&quot; The Ohio Guard officers contend that loaded weapons have a deterrent value. No doubt. But no one informed the demonstrators that the troops had live ammunition. Nor were any warning shots fired. Those facts, together with the totally inadequate tactical leadership of the group that felt it was entrapped, raise serious doubts about the Guards&#039; professionalism—and about the wisdom of the decision to employ them.&quot;
TIME magazine, May 18, 1970</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whose orders? At week&#8217;s end there was still no answer. Canterbury (Brigadier General Robert Canterbury, the ranking officer on the campus,)insisted that &#8220;no one gave an order.&#8221; That statement strains credibility. By Canterbury&#8217;s own count, 16 or 17 men fired 35 rounds. They started at virtually the same moment and stopped at the same moment. Many civilian spectators at the scene and some officials seeking to reconstruct the event are convinced that an order was given. And someone made the initial mistake of ordering live ammunition distributed to all the men and permitting them to load their rifles—a procedure that is contrary to regular Army practice in civil disturbances. Once weapons are loaded, says one Pentagon officer, &#8220;you have effectively lost control of that unit. You have given them the license to fire.&#8221; The Ohio Guard officers contend that loaded weapons have a deterrent value. No doubt. But no one informed the demonstrators that the troops had live ammunition. Nor were any warning shots fired. Those facts, together with the totally inadequate tactical leadership of the group that felt it was entrapped, raise serious doubts about the Guards&#8217; professionalism—and about the wisdom of the decision to employ them.&#8221;<br />
TIME magazine, May 18, 1970</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkruse</title>
		<link>http://smithersmpls.com/2009/05/05/39-years-ago-3/comment-page-1/#comment-35439</link>
		<dc:creator>jkruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smithersmpls.com/2009/05/05/39-years-ago-3/#comment-35439</guid>
		<description>I think this really is a case where pictures convey more than words.  Thanks for posting them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this really is a case where pictures convey more than words.  Thanks for posting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
