confused

May 8th, 2008 | by Smithers |

How come Republicans can be so quick to call liberals Nazis but when real Nazis are exposed they usually turn out to be Republicans?

  1. 4 Responses to “confused”

  2. By Bike Bubba at 9:57 am on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    Oh, you mean like the people who are supporting the PLO as the PLO (or PA if you will) revives the blood libel? Nope, that would be liberal democrats. Or what about Lyndon LaRouche? Nope, Democrat again.

    Yes, this guy is an embarassment–but hey, that goes across the center of the aisle, my friend.

  3. By cjb at 12:09 pm on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    Wow — you know you’re grasping at straws when you use Lyndon LaRouche to tar “liberal democrats.”

  4. By muyres at 10:00 am on May 11, 2008 | Reply

    Because the root of all evil lay in the hands of the Mother Load. Dont be Pro-liberal, be anti-republican. </i

  5. By Bike Bubba at 11:14 am on May 12, 2008 | Reply

    Actually, not trying to do that, but rather to merely illustrate with real names that when people are tied to ‘ol Schicklgruber, it ain’t just Republicans. But reality is that just as David Duke humiliated the GOP, so did LaRouche humiliate the Dems.

    And the Dems SHOULD be humiliated that a lot of their number are taking the side of a group (PA) that’s putting the blood libel into textbooks and onto radio waves, but I’ve not seen as much complaint about that as I’d like.

Post a Comment

Available Tags: Hyperlink <a href="">, Bold <b>, Italics <i>, Strike <strike>, Underline <u>. Don't forget to turn it off </example>.